Stepping Up from a Cheep Streo System to Better Sound Quality

When you purchased the mini system or boombox you currently own, did you ever think to bring a favourite CD to the shop, and take the time to compare it carefully against other models to hear whether it sounded good and actually conveyed the music? Sadly, I suspect very few people ever go that far.

ONKYO mini system

In the first place, the mini systems and boomboxes lined up in consumer electronics shops are, in the case of most models, mass-produced at low cost by large general electronics manufacturers — which means that from a sales and profit perspective, the priority inevitably falls not on “how good does it sound?” but rather on whether production costs can be cut to the bone, whether the feature list is impressive enough to appeal to buyers, whether the look is on-trend, whether it catches the eye on the shop floor. Put bluntly, the reality is that these products are conceived and produced from a commercial standpoint centred on whether something can be made to look like it sounds good.

On the sound quality side as well, high and mid-bass frequencies are often pushed up unnaturally to stand out amid the ambient noise of a shop floor, creating an impression of impact — which in turn means adding tuning choices and circuitry that would otherwise be undesirable from a purely sonic standpoint. The result tends to drift away from what audio is fundamentally about: a tool for enjoying music at home over the long term. Even when sound quality — pushed to the very bottom of the priority list — is left to the sensitivity and conscience of the engineers, the reality is that short development cycles and tight manufacturing cost constraints often make it difficult to achieve even a reasonably decent sound.

That said, it is also an interesting fact that even among boomboxes and mini systems — which present so many problems from a music-first perspective — good-sounding models do occasionally turn up. In that sense, it is not the case that all mini systems are necessarily low quality. If your budget means you can only choose from this class of product, I would encourage you to audition in the shop, however awkward it may feel. If you can manage it on a weekday morning or just before closing time when other customers are less likely to be in the way, bring along a CD you listen to regularly, ask a member of staff for help, and take your time doing a proper comparison — I think you will discover that even inexpensive boomboxes and mini systems vary in sound quality to a surprising degree, that “sound quality you can enjoy music with” and “high sound quality” mean subtly different things, and that sound quality, musicality, and price do not necessarily go hand in hand.

That said, if you are genuinely enjoying music and feel satisfied with a mini system or boombox, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Regardless of price or class, if you are actually enjoying the music as you listen, then either it suits you, or it may simply be a model with genuinely high musicality. Even among expensive high-end Hi-Fi systems, there are plenty that are no fun to listen to at all, that lack musicality, or that — at an even more basic level — have some mysterious distortion that makes them genuinely unpleasant to sit with. Such things exist in abundance in the world of hobby Hi-Fi.

When you purchased the mini system or boombox you currently own, did you ever think to bring a favourite CD to the shop, and take the time to compare it carefully against other models to hear whether it sounded good and actually conveyed the music? Sadly, I suspect very few people ever go that far.

What matters most of all is whether the listener themselves can enjoy the music.

You cannot get enough of listening to music all day long. Before you know it, your CD collection keeps growing and growing. If you could, you would want to buy every new release coming out every week. Listening to music simply makes you happy.

If that is where you are right now, then whatever anyone else may say, and whatever the price of your playback equipment, there is a good chance you have already found the right Hi-Fi system for you.

To put it in terms of cars: a small car is not a bad car, and a large, high-displacement, powerful car is not necessarily a good car. To take it to a more extreme example, a bus or a lorry is not inherently fun to drive. Just as driving enjoyment does not necessarily correspond to the price of a car, musicality does not correspond to the price of a system. Of course, just as engine displacement and a sense of luxury do tend to correlate with price, “surface-level sound quality” and the status value of the equipment do roughly follow the price — but that sort of thing has nothing to do with the essence of music, does it?

To put it the other way around: someone who owns expensive, impressive Hi-Fi equipment but rarely listens to music in daily life, cannot bring themselves to listen, cannot be bothered to collect CDs or records — they may be admirable as an audio enthusiast, but as a music lover they cut rather a sorry figure. And yet, a remarkably large number of enthusiasts end up drifting in exactly that direction — this is a reality of the Hi-Fi world, and in particular of the high-end audio scene. The means and ends become inverted somewhere along the way: what was merely a tool for listening to music takes over, and rather than the music being valued for its content, it ends up serving as a test signal for evaluating the sound quality of the equipment. Music for the sake of the Hi-Fi system. I can accept, I suppose, that in the wide world of hobbies there is room for that kind of equipment-centric enjoyment — but as one music lover who holds music above all else, it is not something I personally want any part of.

Well, this has turned into a rather blunt conclusion — if a mini system is good enough, there is no need to bother with expensive Hi-Fi gear — but that is the nature of hobbies, I suppose. Within the world of Hi-Fi, there is another approach entirely: one that pursues musicality rather than bloodless sound-quality chasing or conspicuous spending, and aims for music reproduction that reaches the heart of how a performance is expressed. And that does not necessarily require an enormous financial investment. “Ako Pure” AUDIO STYLE is an audio blog with music at its centre. The real star of the show is always the music itself. So on this site, rather than talking about equipment-centric hobbying or technical theory, I want to keep exploring what a Hi-Fi life looks like when it is properly cast in a supporting role — focused on the listener’s lifestyle and musicality, in service of the music.

How many beloved CDs and records do you own?
Have you put several times more money into collecting records, CDs, and other source material
than you have spent on your Hi-Fi equipment?

Auto Translated by CS4.6

List of comments (4)

  • はじめまして。そして、お身体の具合はいかがでいらっしゃいますか?
    「はじめてのピュアオーディオ」と検索してここにたどり着きました。
    とてもシャープで示唆に富んだ解説に、本当に感服いたしました。
    特に、「音楽が主」で「オーディオが従」という問いかけが素晴らしい
    と思います。
    私は「大人の嗜み」としてジャズを知りたいと40歳の時に思い立ち、
    それから8年で700枚くらいアルバムを聴きました。そして、さらに
    ジャズ鑑賞が好きになり、オーディオも見直したいと思っています。
    このサイトに集約された情報を基に、20万位の予算でシステムを組みたい
    と考えています。どうぞお見知りおきください。

  • 明けましておめでとうございます&コメントありがとうございます(^^)
    20代の頃に書いた記事ですので大変お恥ずかしい限りですが、読んでいただいて恐縮です。また、お気づかいありがとうございます。体の具合ですが、年末から調子を崩してしまい1月はリハビリ期間になりそうです。ブログは今後もマイペースでゆっくり取り組んでいこうと思っています。
    ここ2年ほど、Twitterで色々なオーディオマニアの皆さん、特にスーパーハイエンドオーディオを好む方々と触れあいましたが、僕が思っていたよりも音楽と機材との主従機関系が逆転したタイプの占める割合が多く、しばしば話が噛み合わなくて色々と難儀しました。高額機材好きなオーディオマニアの皆さんは、機材趣味優先で何が悪い、それも自由な趣味の在り方だと開き直っておられる方が多く、音楽のために、音楽が優先という立場からのオーディオ論を書くことには異論反論が根強くあり、私のようなアプローチは正直なところかなり訝しがられます。「高級品ほど高音質」という彼らが信じ拠り所としている大前提が崩れてしまうからです。ある意味で、触れてはいけないデリケートな話題なのだと感じました。

  • オーディオには本末転倒しないと開けない彼らが自虐的に沼と呼ぶ世界があって、物欲とプライド、マウンティングの代償行為としてハイエンドオーディオを選んでまうと、端から見ていていつまでも終わりの無い機材沼が待ち受けています。その様な世界に嵌まった結果、そもそもの音楽がおざなりになってしまう事が本当に幸せなのか?いつも疑問に感じています。僕は、普通の人が普通の住環境を維持しつつ、無理のない範囲で、一般人のの金銭感覚で長く取り組めるミュージックライフの為のピュアオーディオをコンセプトに、ずっとこのブログを続けてきました。書きかけのネタも多く雑多なブログですが、今後もコンセプトは変わらないと思いますので、ゆるりとお付き合いいただければ幸いですm(__)m

  • よもやお返事がいただけるとは思っていなかったので、大変うれしく思います。体調崩されていらっしゃるとのこと、是非とも早く病状がよくなることを祈念申し上げます。お返事いただいた「高級機至上主義」への疑問、なるほどと思います。きっと、自分では重要なことに取り組んでいると思い込んでいて、実は枝葉末節の迷路を彷徨っている、という感じなのでしょうか。偏愛も良し悪しなのかもしれません。私は幸か不幸か、自由になるお金が少ないので、管理人様の提案に喜んで乗っかる凡庸な音楽好きであります。是非、大多数の音楽好きがハッピーになれる記事を書いてくださいませ。今後の展開も楽しみに待っております。

To comment